Balancing Scale and Yield: My Self-Storage REIT Strategy

Self-storage has quietly become one of the most resilient corners of real estate. Demand for secure, affordable storage space continues to grow, and REITs in this sector have delivered steady income streams for investors. Within my portfolio, CubeSmart (CUBE) has long been the anchor—an established, institutional-backed giant with hundreds of properties nationwide. Its scale, diversification, and reliable dividend history make it a cornerstone holding, and it will continue to represent roughly 80% of my self-storage allocation.

But scale isn’t the only story worth telling. Recently, I’ve taken a small position in Global Self Storage (SELF), a much smaller REIT with only 13 properties across several states. At first glance, SELF’s size might seem like a disadvantage compared to CUBE’s national footprint. Yet its dividend yield—currently 5.81%—is notably higher, offering an opportunity to compound income more aggressively. For an investor focused on transparency and long-term growth, that yield is worth exploring, even if the risks are greater.

Of course, payout ratios tell a cautionary tale. SELF’s dividend payout exceeds its net income, raising questions about sustainability. By contrast, CUBE’s dividend is well-covered when measured against Funds From Operations (FFO), the preferred metric for REITs. This difference underscores why I’m keeping SELF to just 3% of my self-storage allocation for now. It’s a tactical position: enough to benefit from the yield and potential growth, but not so large that it jeopardizes the stability of my compounding strategy.

The balance between reliability and opportunity is at the heart of this decision. CUBE provides the institutional strength and dividend security that underpins my portfolio. SELF, meanwhile, represents a calculated bet on a smaller player with higher yield potential. Together, they create a blend of stability and growth—an approach that allows me to compound income while staying diversified.

In the end, investing is about more than chasing yield or clinging to scale. It’s about constructing a portfolio that reflects both caution and curiosity. By maintaining CUBE as my foundation and adding SELF as a small but intentional position, I’m aiming to capture the best of both worlds: dependable income and the possibility of outsized growth.

I like the Real Estate Sector, and Self-Storage is important and preferred. I will equally grow these two together. I value that SELF has focus on revamping, or restoring, as I perceived, Self-Storage Properties that exist.

HPQ’s After-Hours Dip: Why I’m Buying More

I’ve always had a soft spot for HP. My first real workhorse computer was an HP, and it lasted me far longer than I expected. The printers and scanners I’ve owned from them have been equally reliable — machines that just keep going, year after year. That kind of longevity builds trust, and it’s one of the reasons I pay attention to HPQ not just as a consumer, but as an investor.

So when I saw HPQ’s stock dip after-hours following their latest earnings release, I didn’t panic. In fact, I saw opportunity. The headlines focused on job cuts and cautious guidance, but the fundamentals tell a different story. EPS came in at $0.93, right in line with expectations, and revenue was slightly ahead. The market’s reaction wasn’t about what HP delivered — it was about what they said might happen next.

HP’s announcement of 4,000–6,000 layoffs and restructuring charges spooked traders, but I see it as a disciplined move. This isn’t a company in retreat; it’s a company tightening its belt to protect margins and keep the dividend alive. And that dividend matters. At a yield of 4.75%, qualified and consistent, HPQ is rewarding shareholders even as it navigates industry headwinds. For me, that’s a sign of resilience.

It’s worth remembering that HP split into two entities years ago: HP Inc. (HPQ), which focuses on personal systems and printing, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), which handles servers, storage, and enterprise solutions. That breakup allowed each company to sharpen its focus. HPQ has leaned into consumer and commercial devices, while HPE pursued enterprise infrastructure. Both moves made sense, and HPQ’s cost reduction measures today are a continuation of that same survival instinct — adapt, streamline, and endure.

I expect a rebound in the morning. Markets often overreact to restructuring news, and once the dust settles, investors remember the core strengths: HP’s brand, its installed base of loyal customers, and its steady cash generation. For me, the after-hours dip is a chance to buy shares at a discount. It’s like picking up a reliable HP printer on sale — you know it will deliver, and you’re happy to lock in the value.

This fits neatly into my Augmented Income Strategy (A.I.S.). By adding discounted shares now, I position myself to trim later at a profit, while simultaneously increasing my dividend income. It’s a strategy that compounds over time, much like HP’s machines that keep working long after others have worn out.

HPQ isn’t a flashy growth stock, but it doesn’t need to be. It’s a company that has proven its durability, both in the products I’ve used and in the way it manages its business. The current dip is not a warning sign — it’s an invitation. And I’m accepting it.

The ENPH Log: Marrying Product Conviction with Downside Leveraged Trading

It’s a chilly morning on November 21, 2025. The Enphase microinverters on my roof are humming—a reliable, silent machine that confirms, day in and day out, why I believe in this company. My investment thesis has always been rooted in the M250 and Enlighten monitoring: the superior architecture of panel-level independence and granular visibility. This isn't just a stock; it's a product I trust.

But conviction, as the last year has shown, is worthless without tactical execution.

My trade log for Enphase Energy (ENPH) is a painful map of buying in the euphoria of the $100s and battling the subsequent collapse caused by high interest rates and solar market headwinds. It’s a log defined by my use of the Downside Leveraged Strategy (D.L.S.).

D.L.S.: My Strategy of Discipline and Dry Powder

The D.L.S. is my personal signal for a specific maneuver: intentionally realizing a capital loss with the conviction that the market will drive the price even lower. The goal is twofold: Tax-Loss Harvesting (using the loss to offset other gains) and the Redeployment of Capital to repurchase the same high-quality asset at a much deeper discount.

The execution, however, is governed by a singular, rigid master: the IRS Wash Sale Rule. This rule forbids claiming a loss if the stock is repurchased within the 30 days before or after the sale date. To make D.L.S. effective, discipline is everything. You have to endure the possibility of missing a rebound to ensure the tax benefits are secure.

Looking back at the log reveals a period of intense financial and psychological pressure:

Date	Action	Price	Trade Log Notes
Feb 26, 2025	Sell	$65.60	D.L.S. initiated. Took a harsh loss to capture the tax benefit.
Aug 28, 2025	Sell	$37.56	Wash Sale Harvesting Losses. A tactical retreat at a much lower price, creating dry powder.
Nov 13, 2025	Buy	$29.90	D.L.S. Re-entry. Successfully repurchased well outside the 61-day wash sale window.

The key transaction was the August sale at $37.56. By successfully waiting out the 31-day period and buying back at $29.90 in November, the strategy was executed to near-perfection: the loss was secured, and the position was rebuilt at a $7.66 per share discount. This maneuver is exactly how you "rebound the investment"—you don't just wait for the price to rise; you lower your cost basis dramatically when the opportunity arises.

The Current Opportunity: $26.12

Today, the stock trades around $26.12. This is the price floor, where institutional analysts place their lowest estimates. The market is ignoring the operational recovery shown in the recent Q3 earnings (Net Income up 80% sequentially) and focusing solely on macro fear.

This is the ultimate test of the Peter Lynch thesis: The product is superior, the competitive moat (individual microinverters) is intact, and the stock is dirt cheap (trading at a P/E multiple below 20x). The company is financially healthy, capable of weathering the storm, and poised to capture market share once the solar financing environment improves.

I have successfully harvested my losses, and my capital is now ready. The hesitant question is whether the true D.L.S. move is finished. I believe the long-term bet remains solid. The current price level gives me the courage to continue adding small, strategic amounts, dollar-cost averaging back into a company I know makes the best product on the market.

This is a bet on technology over temporary turmoil. I’m patient, I’m positioned, and I have the best view in the world to confirm my conviction.

---

The Inevitable Upgrade: From Rooftop Shade to Refueling at Home

I’ve spent years immersed in the solar world, from managing an array with Enphase microinverters to tracking the financial shifts of the industry. The incredible truth that is often overlooked is the foundation we already have: an amazing, robust national electrical grid. This vast infrastructure isn't an obstacle; it's the partner that allows rooftop solar to seamlessly feed clean energy back to the community and provides the reliable backbone for the next great revolution: the electrification of transportation.

Solar, for me, is no longer just about generating electricity. It’s a multi-layered home upgrade. My panels provide a cooling shade canopy for the roof, significantly reducing the heat absorbed by my home in the summer—a kind of passive, free air conditioning. They protect the longevity of the shingles beneath them. And now, thanks to the sun, they fill up my cars.

Seeing The Ignorance Barrier

I am on my second electric vehicle now, and the profound ignorance in the general population still shocks me. The most frequent question? "Where do you charge your car?". My thought is usually, "You do have Electricity at Home?"!

But I, too, had a moment of ignorance. When I first bought an EV, a 2014 Nissan Leaf, I relied on a painfully slow 110-volt outlet. This works just fine for my Senior-Citizen Mother, who also sports an Electric Vehicle and charges at home with her car’s meager, roughly 1-amp Level 1 charger. (Contextual-Side-Note: That charger, technically, is an EVSE—Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment—and yes, it’s not just a fancy extension cord.) However, for my own daily driving, that slow pace was agonizing. Before I could truly unlock the car's potential, I had to embrace a bizarre contrast of high-tech and low-tech bureaucracy.

My first necessary step wasn't ordering the, "Charger," it was spending precious time getting a permit then being on hold with a 1-800 utility line marking number! Before I could bury a line to power a vehicle that’s literally ready for the future, I had to wait for guys with spray paint to confirm I wouldn’t sever a gas main or the fiber optic cable. That done, I rented a trencher—I know I do things many people wouldn't, as DIY electrical work, or digging a 3' deep 100-foot trench, is not for the faint of heart—but it’s certainly not that difficult. I ran a new line and installed a 20-amp, 240-volt breaker to power my 16-amp Level 2 EVSE. Funnily enough, that whole trenching and wiring job near my own parking spot was far more difficult than the simple EVSE installations I championed for my sister and mother. I now own my family's successful adoption of electric vehicles, and thankfully, it has proven to be problem-free thus far.

Back to the charger. The revelation wasn't the speed; it was the convenience. The single greatest benefit of an EV is the ability to "fill up" while you are where you were already heading: home. You are always, "ready to roll". The thought of stopping at a gas station, diverting my journey for 10 minutes to pump a dirty, volatile liquid, that is just gone after usage, feels like a relic of a bygone era. Those that know me are well aware I do own stock in Exxon Mobil and Chevron and I greatly appreciate everyone that still uses gasoline but I see the future. This has to be similar to when vehicles moved from steam engines to gasoline!

My personal advocacy recently hit a new milestone: my wife finally traded in her last gasoline vehicle—right after its final, begrudging oil change and tune-up—for an electric car as well. So now, we face the monumental challenge of charging two cars with a single 16-amp, 240-volt EVSE. And for all the naysayers opposing the course of electrification, here is the simple truth: our existing charger offers plenty of speed. Because charging is a nightly habit, not a destination stop, both of our electric vehicles are consistently full and ready to go every single day. The perceived "problem" of a two-car electric household dissolves instantly when you realize you charge for hours while sleeping, not minutes while waiting. The only thing we occasionally manage is the plug-in schedule, which takes about five seconds a night. The biggest question we face now is whose turn it is to plug in the car, not whose turn it is to stop at a gas station.

Beyond the fueling itself, the convenience extends to the complete elimination of a maintenance headache. My first EV ran for 11 years and I barely touched its brakes. My new EV- a Newer Model Nissan Leaf with a much larger EV-Battery (Go big, it's worth it) and my Wife's Tesla, with their highly refined regenerative braking, rarely requires us to depress the brake pedal at all. Lift the accelerator past a certain point, and the car slows, brake lights illuminate, and the battery is recovering energy instead of wasting it as transformed heat and dust. I fully expect the brakes on our new cars to last its entire lifetime.

As someone who has worked in transportation, I’ve seen firsthand the sheer volume of used oil and fluids that garages produce and send for recycling. That used oil, transmission fluid, and fuel system waste, if improperly handled, can contaminate millions of gallons of freshwater. The entire combustion engine ecosystem is built on the continuous creation of toxic waste. An EV, powered by solar, is a fundamentally cleaner, more efficient, and more enjoyable machine.

My wife and I love the extended range and superior features of her new Tesla, which only deepens my desire for more solar panels. The whole system—rooftop generation, home charging, and regenerative braking—is a beautiful, closed loop of efficiency that provides not just power, but profound philosophical satisfaction. We are actively eliminating the need for a convoluted, wasteful logistics chain: no more trucks transporting crude oil, no more trains carrying oil, no more smaller trucks delivering refined products to massive storage tanks buried beneath parking lots, and no more pumps dispensing that finished product into our cars, only for it to be expelled into the air and gone forever. Instead, our fuel comes from the sun and is largely stored and utilized right here at home. My wife, thankfully, has the added luxury of charging at both home and at work, which made the transition for her seamless and easy. As I said earlier, when your family follows your lead, you own their decision, and seeing her embrace the superior convenience of the electric lifestyle is the ultimate vindication of this entire solar-EV endeavor.

But this future must be equitable. I constantly question the millions who live in apartment complexes or rent. They are at the mercy of their landlords to provide the infrastructure. While solutions like shared Level 2 charging stations and new initiatives exist to help renters and building owners navigate installation, this remains the biggest hurdle for mass adoption. We have the technology, we have the grid, and we have the will; we must now ensure that the economic and environmental benefits of solar-powered EV driving are not reserved solely for those who own their roof and driveway.

My wife's new Tesla only confirms what I've learned from my own EV journey: it is, by far, the superior electric car for long-distance travel. This capability isn't just about range (though the range is excellent); it's about the entire ecosystem. The tightly integrated navigation system is a game-changer, automatically plotting charging stops, pre-conditioning the battery for maximum speed, and eliminating the stress of range anxiety. When you're on the road, that speed of charging at the Supercharger network—adding hundreds of miles in minutes—is simply unmatched. Now, with the new models rolling out bidirectional charging (Vehicle-to-Home, or V2H), our EV is no longer just a car; it's a massive battery that can power our house during an outage. This innovation completely closes the loop, allowing us to generate power on the roof, fill the car, and use the car to power the home. It is a level of integrated energy management that no gasoline vehicle could ever dream of achieving.

The sum of all this experience—from the high-efficiency pulse of the microinverters on my roof to the near-zero maintenance simplicity of our two EVs—makes the future crystal clear. It is a future where we make our own energy, relying on the sun as the inexhaustible source. Rooftop solar makes this all capable, bringing with it the added practical, undeniable benefits of roof preservation and contributing to the thermal envelope of the house. We are not just buying electricity; we are buying a closed-loop system of independence, efficiency, and environmental responsibility. Now, staring at the historically low price of Enphase stock, the decision is less about market timing and more about conviction. Do I put my money where my roof is? Do I trust the superior technology I installed and monitor daily to ultimately win out against temporary macroeconomic turbulence? The product quality is unmatched. The technological trend is inevitable. For me, recommitting to Enphase isn't just a stock trade; it's the final, necessary investment in the electric future I’ve already built in my driveway. The decision, when framed by my solar array and the hum of my EV charger, practically makes itself.

Shifting Gears: My Strategy Update for Stellus Capital (SCM)

I've been a regular investor in Stellus Capital Investment Corp. (SCM), a Business Development Company (BDC), and have been diligently compounding its attractive dividends. The power of reinvesting those payouts is undeniable for long-term wealth building, especially with a high-yield instrument like SCM.

However, after a recent deep dive into SCM's financials and a re-evaluation of my investment goals, I've decided to hit pause on the Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP) for my SCM holdings. Let me be clear: this isn't a sell signal for my existing shares, but rather a strategic adjustment focused on capital preservation and future flexibility.

My primary concern has shifted from simply maximizing monthly income to ensuring the "rebound" of my initial investment. BDCs are unique, lending primarily to middle-market companies, and their dividends are directly tied to the interest income from their loan portfolios.

A key factor in my decision is the latest reported Net Asset Value (NAV) per share of $13.05, compared to SCM's recent trading price around $11.80. The stock is currently trading at a discount of nearly 10% to its underlying asset value. When you combine this with the fact that the regular quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share is currently not fully covered by the Core Net Investment Income (NII) of $0.34 per share, it signals a tighter margin for safety.

Continuing to reinvest dividends in shares that are trading below NAV, and from a dividend that is currently uncovered by core earnings, could mean buying into potential further depreciation.

By stopping the DRIP, I'm opting to take the dividends in cash. This gives me several advantages:

1. Capital Preservation: I'm not automatically committing more capital to a potentially falling asset if the market's concerns about SCM's portfolio or dividend sustainability prove accurate.

2. Flexibility: The cash dividends provide me with capital that I can deploy strategically. I can wait for a clearer sign of stabilization or recovery in SCM's price, or I can choose to diversify this cash into other opportunities that I believe have a stronger path to capital appreciation.

3. Risk Mitigation: It hedges against the risk of a dividend cut. If SCM is forced to reduce its payout, I won't have compounded shares at an unsustainable yield.

I will continue to hold my existing SCM shares, monitoring the company's performance, particularly its NII coverage and NAV. This move reflects a more conservative approach to my capital, prioritizing the long-term health of my investment over short-term income maximization.

Disclaimer: This blog post reflects my personal investment strategy and is for informational purposes only. It is not financial advice, nor is it a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. All investment decisions should be made based on your own research, risk tolerance, and consultation with a qualified financial advisor.

AMCR & SON – Two New Packaging Players Added Into My Income Strategy

Today I logged two new positions in my Trading World: Amcor PLC (AMCR) and Sonoco Products (SON). Both reside in the packaging sector and both are meaningful additions to the income augmentation portion of my portfolio. Packaging is a business I’ve always viewed as deceptively powerful. It has necessity, it has real industrial value, and it has stickiness across food, beverage, consumer goods, medical, pharmaceutical, personal care – all of the supply chain areas that are never going out of style. What changes is who executes well, who maintains margins, who scales responsibly, and who rewards shareholders. In this category, AMCR and SON stood out to me as ideal contrasts and complementary positions.

Amcor immediately caught my eye for yield. The dividend yield hovering above 6% is hard to ignore. It signals an opportunity to amplify my income flow, especially given my focus on making income more consistent and more meaningful as I continue investing more seriously, now that I no longer drive CDL commercially. But attractive yields usually come with a caution sign, and Amcor fits that paradigm. Their scale and recent acquisition moves provide upside potential, but there is real execution risk. They need to navigate integration, cost synergy follow-through, margin stabilization, and free cash flow discipline. If they succeed, AMCR could end up being one of the more rewarding income engines in this part of the market. If they don’t, risk can show up quickly. Still, I am willing to take that elevated reward in exchange for monitoring the data closely.

Sonoco, on the other hand, carries a lower yield than Amcor but shows a very stable posture. Dividend payout ratio looks safer, margins are healthier, and SON has an extremely long history of returning capital to shareholders with consistency. In a sector with several large players and no real monopoly threat, Sonoco feels more like the reliable backbone position that pairs with AMCR’s “reach for higher return” profile.

Adding these two together allows me to diversify inside the same category, not by product, but by risk structure. SON is my stability anchor. AMCR is my income amplifier. Both still operate within a sector I understand and believe in: packaging is not a fleeting trend, it is infrastructure for commerce, distribution, and modern consumption.

This entry marks another step in intelligently shaping the income side of my long-term financial strategy. I can now watch how AMCR executes, how SON sustains, and how my overall yield improves from here.

Resources:
Sonoco Products Company - Investor Relations
    Sonoco Products Company - Stock Info - Dividend History
    Sonoco Products Company - Stock Info - Analyst Coverage
Amcor Investors Home page for Investor Relations | Amcor
    Amcor Shareholders Our Shareholder Dividends |Amcor | Amcor
    Amcor Berry page with materials regarding this transaction | Amcor

Disclaimer:
The information provided in this post reflects my personal opinions, research, and trading activity. It is not financial advice, investment advice, tax advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Every investor has different financial circumstances, risk tolerance, and objectives. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial professional or advisor before making investment decisions. All investing involves risk, including the loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

The Pullback Opportunity: Is Paycom (PAYC) Primed for a Swing Trade?

The world is rapidly moving away from cash, solidifying the importance of the digital transaction economy. This megatrend is why companies like Paycom (PAYC) remain a perpetual fixture on many investors' watchlists—including my own. Their suite of cloud-based payroll and HR solutions, particularly innovations like their automated payroll product, Beti, speak directly to the efficiency businesses crave.

Today, however, the stock is trading lower, and it seems the market is focused on a recent piece of news: Paycom's Q3 2025 earnings report.

The Breakdown: A Slight Earnings Miss

Despite solid fundamentals and an overall positive trajectory, the drop appears to be a classic "sell the news" reaction. Here's what hit the tape:

• The Miss: Q3 2025 non-GAAP Earnings Per Share (EPS) of $1.94 slightly missed the consensus analyst estimate of $1.96. In the high-growth tech world, a tiny miss can lead to an outsized market reaction.

• The Positive Story: Revenue actually beat estimates, growing over 9% year-over-year to $493.3 million. Crucially, their Recurring Revenue—the most valuable and predictable part of the business—jumped by $10.6\%$ year-over-year.

• The Outlook: The company reaffirmed its full-year 2025 revenue guidance, which is generally a sign of management confidence in the core business.

Analyst Consensus and the "Hold" Signal

The current analyst landscape reflects this mixed message, with a general consensus of Hold.

Analyst Firm	Rating	Price Target
J.P. Morgan	Hold	$220.00
UBS	Buy	$245.00
Mizuho Securities	Hold	$180.00

It’s worth noting the one "Buy" rating from UBS and an average analyst price target consensus of around $233.15, which still represents a significant potential upside from its current depressed price.

The Swing Trader's View (That's Me, Here!)

For a trader, this immediate drop creates a very interesting setup. The pullback is driven by a marginal EPS miss, not a catastrophic business failure. The company's key growth engine—recurring revenue and its competitive edge with automation tools like Beti and IWant—remains robust.

The current price reduction feels like an emotional overreaction, screaming for a Swing/Mean Reversion trade. The market has temporarily forgotten the strong revenue, growing margins, and reaffirmed guidance, creating a potential technical entry point. My own past success trading PAYC has always been about capitalizing on these moments of irrational market pessimism. The key now is to watch for the stock to stabilize near a key support level before making a move to capitalize on the anticipated bounce back toward its pre-earnings range.

I believe there will be a reversion from today's pre-market trading.

PAYCPAYCOM SOFTWARE INC COM

$183.710.00 (0.00%)

At close: Nov 5, 2025, 4:10 PM ET

Extended hours

$173.22-10.49 (-5.71%)

Bid x Size

$172.50 x 100

Ask x Size

$174.01 x 100

Before hours: Nov 6, 2025, 9:07 AM ET

Is Crown Castle (CCI) Really Recovering or Finally Turning the Corner?

Crown Castle’s third quarter numbers mark what could be a genuine turning point for the company. After several difficult quarters filled with write-downs and negative earnings, the latest results show both operational stability and a return to profitability. With a new CEO now leading the company and a renewed focus on its core U.S. infrastructure, CCI may finally be positioning itself for a measured recovery.

Revenue continues to trend slightly lower at $1.07 billion, down from $1.65 billion a year earlier, but that drop looks less troubling when compared to the company’s improved cost control. Operating income held firm at $525 million, and the cost of revenue fell from $460 million to $280 million. Selling, general, and administrative expenses also declined sharply, showing that management has been serious about efficiency.

What’s most notable this quarter is that earnings finally turned positive again after a year dominated by impairments and restructuring costs. The company’s leadership transition appears to be bringing new discipline. In the earnings call, the CEO emphasized simplifying operations, focusing exclusively on the U.S. market, and exiting less strategic areas of the business. That renewed domestic concentration could improve predictability and long-term cash flow, particularly as major clients like AT&T continue to expand their 5G networks.

Still, the company’s debt load and high interest expenses remain a drag. CCI paid about $247 million in interest this quarter, a heavy burden that limits flexibility. For now, the $1.06 quarterly dividend remains generous but stretches beyond the comfort zone of CCI’s earnings base. If the cost-cutting and portfolio refocusing continue, however, that payout could become more secure over time.

So, is Crown Castle out of the woods? Perhaps not fully, but it’s no longer lost in them either. The balance sheet is stabilizing, leadership is taking a clearer direction, and the company is finally generating positive income again. There’s more work to be done, but this quarter feels less like survival and more like the start of a disciplined recovery.

CCI’s recent third-quarter earnings mark a meaningful pivot toward positive territory. While revenues remain subdued, the company’s renewed operational focus, efficient cost control, and return to profitability signal that the business is moving beyond mere stabilization into early recovery. The shift in leadership and emphasis on U.S. infrastructure, particularly alignment with major carriers, adds strategic clarity. For now, my stance is to Hold: monitor the upcoming quarterly results for consistency in earnings and cash-flow, before increasing my position.

Disclaimer
This blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. You should conduct your own analysis or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any trading decisions. I hold shares of CCI and use a personal swing-trading strategy; therefore I may have a vested interest in the performance of the stock. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Further Reading:
Crown Castle Reports Third Quarter 2025 Results and Increases Outlook for Full Year 2025 | Crown Castle
Investors | Crown Castle