Skip to main content

I Don't Believe Harris Wrote Her Concession Speech Before A Handpicked Audience

My question of whether Vice President Kamala Harris wrote her own concession speech—or speeches like it—reflects a larger sentiment regarding the authenticity of political figures and their public addresses. The overwhelming sense that we are in the Truman Show. Watching Harris on stage, many viewers are left wondering how much of what they see is her unfiltered voice and how much has been shaped by teams of speechwriters, strategists, and public relations experts. From the repetitive language to the calculated pacing, certain elements of political speeches can stand out, leaving an impression of performance rather than genuine connection.

One particularly striking example is the repetitive phrasing, like “Hear me when I say, but hear me when I say,” which was designed to emphasize a point. In practice, however, it often sounds like overdone rhetoric—an attempt to evoke emotion more than convey substance. This type of repetition can feel forced, as though it was crafted for media sound bites rather than as part of a sincere dialogue with the American people. It’s common for speeches to include memorable phrases that rally supporters around specific ideas, but excessive repetition can sometimes make the speaker seem scripted and detached, which only feeds skepticism about whether these words genuinely belong to the politician delivering them.

Moreover, the use of a teleprompter—while standard for high-stakes speeches—adds another layer of separation. Teleprompters help politicians deliver a clear, uninterrupted message and prevent the risk of going off-topic or making unplanned remarks. But the subtle rhythm that teleprompters introduce can sometimes make the entire performance feel rehearsed: a glance at the screen, a few words spoken directly to the camera, a pause, and then a look back up to finish a line with emphasis. Harris, like many seasoned politicians, is skilled at navigating this technique. However, for viewers who desire raw, unscripted emotion, this polished style of speaking can feel more like a staged event than a heartfelt message.

The sensation of “puppetry” extends beyond Harris herself. The people involved in these events—campaign aides, audience members, even the media—can appear as though they, too, are performing a role rather than reacting organically. Speeches often occur before hand-picked audiences who have been briefed on when to cheer, applaud, or respond in unison. The calculated nature of these reactions adds to the sense that what we’re witnessing is less an honest exchange with the American public and more a carefully orchestrated play. To some, this environment of rehearsed responses, scripted speeches, and on-cue reactions leaves an impression that authenticity has been sacrificed in favor of maintaining image control.

Ultimately, politicians like Harris are public figures, dependent on teams of professionals to project an image and craft messages that resonate. This support system of speechwriters, strategists, and advisors aims to ensure that every word is purposeful and polished, every phrase calculated to inspire or reassure. Yet, for those watching, the sense of stagecraft can undermine the effectiveness of these efforts, making it harder to discern true sentiment amid the layers of presentation. The language, the teleprompter, the staging, and even the audience all contribute to an environment that, at times, feels manufactured. It’s a complex trade-off: the intention behind a well-crafted speech is to unite and inspire, yet when it feels overly rehearsed, it risks alienating viewers who are hoping for a candid, heartfelt conversation.

My Thought

In the end, this carefully orchestrated image leaves many feeling, "Disillusioned". As politics becomes more scripted, the barrier between politician and public only grows. For the average citizen, there’s an enduring hope for sincerity in the words of their leaders, a desire to believe that speeches are genuine expressions rather than polished performances. Yet, as long as image control remains a central focus, that hope remains difficult to satisfy.

Popular posts from this blog

How to Add Beneficiaries on E*TRADE Without Losing Your Mind

“Because your money should go where you want it, not where the probate court thinks it should, I am sharing this information.” Ah, E*TRADE. The place where your money grows, your trades execute (sometimes), and your hopes for financial freedom flutter like a candlestick chart on a volatile Thursday. But what happens if you kick the bucket before you get that Tesla stock to moon? Simple: you assign a beneficiary. Unfortunately, E*TRADE doesn’t make this as intuitive as you might think. This isn’t a “click here and boom, you’re immortal” situation. But fear not, fellow capitalist. I’ve braved the pixelated jungle so you don’t have to. 🛠️ Step-by-Step: Setting a Beneficiary for Your E*TRADE Brokerage Account (aka “How to ensure your money doesn’t end up in your ex’s lap or your neighbor's GoFundMe”) Log in at etrade.com . (Obvious, yes. But worth saying—this isn’t Webkinz, you need the real site.) At the top, click “Accounts” and select your Brokerage Account . (The on...

NJ's Middle-Class Squeeze: Too Much for Help, Not Enough for Comfort

This is a long post — longer than what I usually write — because what I’m talking about here isn’t a small annoyance or a passing frustration. It’s something that has been building for years, and I’m finally putting it all into words. I’m upset, I’m exhausted, and I’m passionate about what follows, because it affects every working person in this state who’s trying to stay afloat. There’s a growing group in New Jersey — people who work full‑time, sometimes more than one job, who earn too much to qualify for assistance but not enough to absorb the constant increases in living costs. These are the people tightening their budgets, lowering their thermostats, cutting back wherever they can, and still watching their bills rise for reasons that have nothing to do with their own usage or behavior. If you’re part of that group, or you know someone who is, then what follows will probably resonate with you. And if you’re not, then I hope this gives you a clearer picture of what the middle class i...

Understanding Treasury Bond Auctions: The Difference Between High Yield and Interest Rate

Treasury bonds are a popular choice for investors looking for a reliable source of income backed by the U.S. government. However, understanding how these bonds are priced at auction can be confusing, especially when comparing the High Yield and the Interest Rate (Coupon Rate) columns. In this post, I'll break it down using a real-world example.  A Look at a Recent Treasury Bond Auction Here’s an example of a 20-year Treasury bond that was recently auctioned: Security Term CUSIP Reopening Issue Date Maturity Date High Yield Interest Rate 20-Year 912810UF3 Yes 01/31/2025 11/15/2044 4.900% 4.625% What Do These Numbers Mean? CUSIP : This is a unique identifier for the bond. Reopening : Since it says "Yes," this means the bond was originally issued earlier and is now being reoffered. Issue Date : January 31, 2025—this is when the bond will be offi...